It takes a lot of commitment to be among the best at what one does. One might even go as far as saying that one would have to make their life revolve entirely around that one thing, and sacrifice immeasurable amounts of time that could be spent on other things. In terms of photography, it could be said that Annie Leibovitz and James Natchwey have accomplished this. Although there are many differences between the two when concerned with the specific methods each professional uses to achieve their results, there are also many similarities. It is apparent that the two, for one, fully commit their lives to finding the most efficient way to produce the best photography they possibly can.
Specifically dealing with photography, the differences the two have to face to achieve their results are quite apparent. Natchwey must face life or death situations to achieve his results, while Leibovitz must completely temporarily immerse herself in the lives of real people, or in a fictional vision. Concerning personality, the two also seem to heavily contrast (according to what was conveyed by the films, anyway). Regardless of these differences, the two have so much in common. Above all else, they both treat their profession like art, and seek to tell stories.

photo by James Natchwey; source: http://www.jokerartgallery.com/
What is truly astounding is how neither artist inherently treats their photography like a job. When a poet writes a poem, they do not sit down and decide “I need my salary. I’m going to write a poem.” Likewise, a (“good”) musician will not sit down and decide “Time to get paid; time to write a song.” And likewise with films, and basically any form of art. The best of the best always starts with a vision (unlike, for example, Air Bud 7). Leibovitz and Natchwey also approach their photography with such an artistic philosophy. Both artists, before they take a photo, always have a story or a message they hope to convey. They use photography to shape this story or message into something their artistic medium can represent.

source: http://www.artknowledgenews.com/
The unfortunate fact seems to be that in order to become truly good at something as Leibovitz and Natchwey are at photography, proportional sacrifices must be made. Consider that Leibovitz, while photographing for Rolling Stones Magazine, had to literally devote her life to immersing herself into the touring lifestyle. Consider that Natchwey is considered by some to be unnaturally sheltered, always putting photography before perhaps even his own life. What these artists do is truly inspirational for anyone in artistic career field, however the cost of becoming this good at a particular form of art comes at the cost of absurd amounts of dedication, which only the truly, truly devoted could even begin to conceive.
March 29, 2010 at 7:25 am
You have some nice ideas and observations here. How are the photos you chose illustrating and/or working with your text?
April 12, 2011 at 7:04 am
I’m commonly not the guy to write comments on people’s blogs, but for this article I just had to complete it. I’ve been digging close to your web page considerably nowadays and I’m awesome impressed, I feel you could truly emerge as the primary voices to your market. Not certain what your load is like in life, but in the event you started devoting much more effort to posting on this website, I would guess you would start seeing a bunch of traffic soon. With ads, it may well become a sweet second revenue stream. Just an idea to ponder. Outstanding luck!